Submission 1
| Reporting Category |
Student Score |
College Board Score |
Comments |
| Program Purpose and Function |
0 |
0 |
the response did not describe the funcionality of the program in the video |
| Data Abstraction |
1 |
0 |
includes two program segments that show data being stored - the second code segment shows another list namedanimalList. The response identifies animalList, but animalList is not being used in either code segment. |
| Managing Complexity |
0 |
0 |
does not explain how the code managaes complexity |
| Procedural Abstraction |
0 |
0 |
does not explain how procedure contributes ot overall functionality of the program |
| Algorithm Implementation |
0 |
0 |
does not explain in detail how the algorithm works |
| Testing |
1 |
1 |
descirbes two different calls for a procedure |
Submission 2
| Reporting Category |
Student Score |
College Board Score |
Comments |
| Program Purpose and Function |
1 |
1 |
video shows a running program and response gives a good description of the program |
| Data Abstraction |
1 |
1 |
includes two program code segment,one that shows how data has been stored in wslthis list and one that shows the data in this same list being |
| Managing Complexity |
1 |
1 |
has a program code segment that includes a list and explains how the list manages complexity |
| Procedural Abstraction |
1 |
1 |
The project includes two code segments and identifies what each of the segment does |
| Algorithm Implementation |
1 |
1 |
includes a student developed algorithm with sequencing, selection, and iteration |
| Testing |
1 |
1 |
descirbes two different calls for a procedure |
Submission 3
| Reporting Category |
Student Score |
College Board Score |
Comments |
| Program Purpose and Function |
1 |
0 |
video shows the running of a program- The response describes the function of the program but not its purpose. The response states,”The program aims to determine the winner of a hypothetical fight between two Marvel characters, based on which character has the higher average in six categories.” This did not |
| satisfy a criteria for this row. |
|
|
|
| Data Abstraction |
1 |
1 |
has two program segments one showing data being stored and another in list |
| Managing Complexity |
1 |
1 |
has a program code segment that includes a list and explains how the list manages complexity |
| Procedural Abstraction |
1 |
1 |
The project includes two code segments and identifies what each of the segment do |
| Algorithm Implementation |
1 |
1 |
includes a student developed algorithm with sequencing, selection, and iteration |
| Testing |
1 |
1 |
descirbes two different calls for a procedure |
Submission 4
| Reporting Category |
Student Score |
College Board Score |
Comments |
| Program Purpose and Function |
1 |
1 |
video shows the running of a program |
| Data Abstraction |
1 |
0 |
has two program segments one showing data being stored and another in list - second code segment, data stored in the list is not being used; only the length of the list is accessed. So the response does not meet this criteria. |
| Managing Complexity |
0 |
0 |
does not show thorough engough complexity in the code segment |
| Procedural Abstraction |
1 |
1 |
The project includes two code segments and identifies what each of the segment do |
| Algorithm Implementation |
1 |
1 |
includes a student developed algorithm with sequencing, selection, and iteration |
| Testing |
1 |
0 |
descirbes two different calls for a procedure - The response gives the conditions being tested rather than two different arguments that cause a different segment of code to execute. Arguments should be specific values used in the call to the procedure. |
Summary
Overall I think I did a good job scoring the exampe submissions. I did get alittle bit better at grading the third row whihc is about managing complexity. I think all 4 examples were quite good, with the second one being very good, I will use that as a guide when making my own project. I definitely find myself getting better at grading these and it hopefully translate to me performing better on my performance task.